A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier as well as Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment with a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result locations are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, notably inside a sensitive coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture which has due to the fact grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water all through serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the internet site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that such steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the lawful timeline.
For the core from the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as constructed, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and conditions hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental defense and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it is about ensuring that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely extended-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair just attempting to build a family members dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Particular Spot of Conservation and say that every one operates have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from incredibly different Skilled backgrounds can find on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must live together with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.